Skip to main content

What else could you have done?


 


Test scores are back. Here in Florida we have officially entered into "What else could you have done?" season for teachers. For you non-teachers out there, this is the time of year that you hold classroom teachers responsible for all of the woes of the world. You hold up the test score of a random student and ask them why the student didn't meet the arbitrary standard set forth by the state. Most often teachers will have an explanation, after all we spend a lot of time with these kids. Most often that explanation involves things that are out of our control. Invariably we are asked the question, "What else could you have done?" 

Don't misunderstand me. I understand that in many business situations this is a very valid question. But in education it is more of an accusation. If every student didn't meet the standard then it has to be your fault. You must have not done enough. You must not have done enough to close the gap, or build the plane while you are flying it, or develop grit (all my teacher peeps get it). 

This one little loaded question can have grave consequences. For a new teacher it can make them feel insecure, and uncertain. For the teacher that is barely holding on it can be the final straw that makes them change their career. And for a great many teachers, this question will cause them to become disenfranchised with the educational system. They will feel like there is nothing that they can do that is good enough. They will lose their passion. These educators might leave the profession, but a more frightening outcome is that they will not. They will remain in their position, apathetic until they retire. 

What else could you have done? The real answer is that we do not know. If we knew, we would done that thing. We did all the things we knew. Why can't that be enough?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Three Is More Than One

  Umm, excuse me Governor Desantis but last year you said that you had a issue with standardized testing. I was like okay, this is a cause that I can get behind. The way we are currently using standardized test in the education system is abhorrent. In many cases these tests are the only measure of student and teacher success. Standardized tests don't allow us to celebrate the small wins. If a student read 2 books last year and 15 books this year, that's a win. If you learned to write your name in cursive, that's a win. If you know how to divide or understand fractions that's a win. I don't care what the test says. When did kids become standardized. My oldest daughter could read before she went to kindergarten. Her sister learned to read in kindergarten. My son could read when he was four. They all turned out just fine. Kids are not standardized.  I was excited to hear that we were doing away with the FSA. As an educator, I felt like someone was finally paying attent...

Digital natives vs. digital fluency

I think digital natives are a real thing, but all digital natives are not fluent. The term native reminds me of the process that babies use to acquire language.  A person is said to be a native speaker when they grow up surrounded by the language that is "native" to them. They grow up hearing their parents use the language and that's how they develop their proficiency. Some kids grow up with an amazing vocabulary and some students enter school at a deficit. Digital literacy is the same. Some students grow up in households where they are surrounded by laptops, phones, reliable internet and online tools that are being used consistently and effectively. But some kids grow up in a house where they don't have those things, or where they don't see these tools put to effective use. Those students are, by definition, digital natives. But are they digitally fluent? Nope. Just because you know how to scroll through TikTok or Instagram, doesn't mean you can navigate onli...

And Another One!!

  Step up to the plate Clay County Florida. A school board member in Clay County thinks that "disciplinary action" should be taken against people who allow books deemed "inappropriate". She goes on to blame librarians for allowing these books into schools. Umm, excuse me ma'am but are you under the impression that the librarian is superhuman. Do you think that they can magically read all of the books in the library and know which ones will offend some random person, at some random time, in the future?  This school board member goes on to explain that she has already identified 75 books containing "pornographic material" that should not be on shelves. They don't provide the list, that would encourage people to think for themselves and that is definitely not the goal. They do however offer some examples, three to be exact. I would have to assume that she choose the most egregious examples to prove her point. The first book is called "Julian is a...