Skip to main content

Students & Social Media

 There is little doubt that I social media can have profound effects on education as we know it. Social media sites give students the opportunity to expand their knowledge by giving them access to experts outside of their immediate circles. This has the potential to be great, but in order for this to work we need to revamp the educational system as we know it. 

Students cannot be left to figure out social media on their own. They need to be explicitly taught how to navigate online spaces. They need to be taught how to think critically. They need to be taught how to analyze the information that is presented to determine if it is accurate or credible. They need to be taught how to communicate effectively when they are not in the physical presence of the person that they are talking to. 

The question becomes who is responsible for teaching the students these skills? When should we start teaching them and how does one teach them?


Comments

  1. Li MengJuly 17, 2022 at 8:37 PM

    Hi, as a parent, I resonate strongly with your post, in fact I have written about this a couple of times in my blog. With Web 2.0 and even 3.0 in the future featuring so heavily in the lives of our kids, who will be responsible for equipping them with the necessary handles to safety navigate the space? My first instinct would be to say its the role of the parents to do it, however my left hand column tells me that parents themselves may not be able to keep up to date with the latest and newest platforms and may be ill equipped to do so as well. I've no easy answer to this but I think more emphasis from schools and parents should be placed on this subject to ensure that learners can navigate the use of social media responsibly.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Three Is More Than One

  Umm, excuse me Governor Desantis but last year you said that you had a issue with standardized testing. I was like okay, this is a cause that I can get behind. The way we are currently using standardized test in the education system is abhorrent. In many cases these tests are the only measure of student and teacher success. Standardized tests don't allow us to celebrate the small wins. If a student read 2 books last year and 15 books this year, that's a win. If you learned to write your name in cursive, that's a win. If you know how to divide or understand fractions that's a win. I don't care what the test says. When did kids become standardized. My oldest daughter could read before she went to kindergarten. Her sister learned to read in kindergarten. My son could read when he was four. They all turned out just fine. Kids are not standardized.  I was excited to hear that we were doing away with the FSA. As an educator, I felt like someone was finally paying attent...
Post a Comment
Read more

Digital natives vs. digital fluency

I think digital natives are a real thing, but all digital natives are not fluent. The term native reminds me of the process that babies use to acquire language.  A person is said to be a native speaker when they grow up surrounded by the language that is "native" to them. They grow up hearing their parents use the language and that's how they develop their proficiency. Some kids grow up with an amazing vocabulary and some students enter school at a deficit. Digital literacy is the same. Some students grow up in households where they are surrounded by laptops, phones, reliable internet and online tools that are being used consistently and effectively. But some kids grow up in a house where they don't have those things, or where they don't see these tools put to effective use. Those students are, by definition, digital natives. But are they digitally fluent? Nope. Just because you know how to scroll through TikTok or Instagram, doesn't mean you can navigate onli...
4 comments
Read more

And Another One!!

  Step up to the plate Clay County Florida. A school board member in Clay County thinks that "disciplinary action" should be taken against people who allow books deemed "inappropriate". She goes on to blame librarians for allowing these books into schools. Umm, excuse me ma'am but are you under the impression that the librarian is superhuman. Do you think that they can magically read all of the books in the library and know which ones will offend some random person, at some random time, in the future?  This school board member goes on to explain that she has already identified 75 books containing "pornographic material" that should not be on shelves. They don't provide the list, that would encourage people to think for themselves and that is definitely not the goal. They do however offer some examples, three to be exact. I would have to assume that she choose the most egregious examples to prove her point. The first book is called "Julian is a...
1 comment
Read more