Teacher Tattling!

If you have friends who are educators, they are not okay. Most of them can tell you stories about a colleague who was disciplined for something that had nothing to do with education and happened outside of work. This trend of "teacher tattling" is concerning especially since online resources and social media are quickly becoming classroom tools. One of the reasons many educators shy away from the use of technology is that they are fearful that it will come back and bite them in the butt. There is a lot of concern surrounding what people will do with student data, but I am interested in looking at privacy from the teacher standpoint.

For educators the line between professional and personal has been blurred for a long time. As a new teacher I was cautioned against using any type of social media, and was once warned because I was seen buying wine in the grocery store. This legacy has been around for a long time. For some reason people feel like teachers don't have the right to be real people. Now by no means am I saying that it's okay to post things that are inappropriate on social media, but I don't think that I should be held to a higher standard as an educator. If everyone else can post a picture of drinks with the ladies, why should I not have the same right.

This line gets even more blurry when we factor in the required use of technology. Technology has a way of making people feel like they have a right to access you and your personal life. I think it will be difficult to keep personal and professional accounts separate. Do I want to have two instagrams, twitter accounts, facebook pages, etc? No of course I don't. It will be difficult to fully incorporate social media as a tool in the classroom until the idea of personal/professional privacy is addressed. Until then we will continue to have educators who push back and revert to older ways of delivering instruction.

Comments

Three Is More Than One

Umm, excuse me Governor Desantis but last year you said that you had a issue with standardized testing. I was like okay, this is a cause that I can get behind. The way we are currently using standardized test in the education system is abhorrent. In many cases these tests are the only measure of student and teacher success. Standardized tests don't allow us to celebrate the small wins. If a student read 2 books last year and 15 books this year, that's a win. If you learned to write your name in cursive, that's a win. If you know how to divide or understand fractions that's a win. I don't care what the test says. When did kids become standardized. My oldest daughter could read before she went to kindergarten. Her sister learned to read in kindergarten. My son could read when he was four. They all turned out just fine. Kids are not standardized. I was excited to hear that we were doing away with the FSA. As an educator, I felt like someone was finally paying attent...

Digital natives vs. digital fluency

I think digital natives are a real thing, but all digital natives are not fluent. The term native reminds me of the process that babies use to acquire language. A person is said to be a native speaker when they grow up surrounded by the language that is "native" to them. They grow up hearing their parents use the language and that's how they develop their proficiency. Some kids grow up with an amazing vocabulary and some students enter school at a deficit. Digital literacy is the same. Some students grow up in households where they are surrounded by laptops, phones, reliable internet and online tools that are being used consistently and effectively. But some kids grow up in a house where they don't have those things, or where they don't see these tools put to effective use. Those students are, by definition, digital natives. But are they digitally fluent? Nope. Just because you know how to scroll through TikTok or Instagram, doesn't mean you can navigate onli...

And Another One!!

Step up to the plate Clay County Florida. A school board member in Clay County thinks that "disciplinary action" should be taken against people who allow books deemed "inappropriate". She goes on to blame librarians for allowing these books into schools. Umm, excuse me ma'am but are you under the impression that the librarian is superhuman. Do you think that they can magically read all of the books in the library and know which ones will offend some random person, at some random time, in the future? This school board member goes on to explain that she has already identified 75 books containing "pornographic material" that should not be on shelves. They don't provide the list, that would encourage people to think for themselves and that is definitely not the goal. They do however offer some examples, three to be exact. I would have to assume that she choose the most egregious examples to prove her point. The first book is called "Julian is a...

Tired Teacher

Search This Blog