Skip to main content

Neighborhood versus Networked

 Throughout history people have balked at the idea of change. Whether we realize it or not we become comfortable with the "status quo". That comfort often manifests itself as a belief that our way is the "right way". Many people see the lack of close in-person relationships as a problem, a departure from the "right way" of relating to other people. They feel like it is an issue that you might not know your neighbor or the guy down the block and I get it. But, if we are going to be fair, we are have to look at the other side of this. I might not know my neighbor, but I have a lot of insight into what goes on in my neighborhood. Social media platforms give us the chance to expand our neighborhoods beyond walking distance. Now we are able to connect with people who are farther away, but like-minded. We can keep up with friends from childhood, or find (in my case) the love 💖of our life. One might even argue that these relationships are stronger due to the fact that they are based on something more than geographic location. Networked people benefit from interactions with a diverse group of individuals and at the end of the day that can't be all bad. Sometimes we have to change the status quo.

Comments

  1. I couldn't agree with you more. The status quo is something that needed to be changed long ago. I think back to 60 years ago and how women were expected to be teachers, nurses, or secretaries. Thanks to other women changing the status quo, we are now free to be whatever we want. I think that social media has helped speed up this process. I really like that you said that you might not know your neighbor, but you know what's going on in your neighborhood. This feels like something that's important to remember going forward. :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Three Is More Than One

  Umm, excuse me Governor Desantis but last year you said that you had a issue with standardized testing. I was like okay, this is a cause that I can get behind. The way we are currently using standardized test in the education system is abhorrent. In many cases these tests are the only measure of student and teacher success. Standardized tests don't allow us to celebrate the small wins. If a student read 2 books last year and 15 books this year, that's a win. If you learned to write your name in cursive, that's a win. If you know how to divide or understand fractions that's a win. I don't care what the test says. When did kids become standardized. My oldest daughter could read before she went to kindergarten. Her sister learned to read in kindergarten. My son could read when he was four. They all turned out just fine. Kids are not standardized.  I was excited to hear that we were doing away with the FSA. As an educator, I felt like someone was finally paying attent...

Digital natives vs. digital fluency

I think digital natives are a real thing, but all digital natives are not fluent. The term native reminds me of the process that babies use to acquire language.  A person is said to be a native speaker when they grow up surrounded by the language that is "native" to them. They grow up hearing their parents use the language and that's how they develop their proficiency. Some kids grow up with an amazing vocabulary and some students enter school at a deficit. Digital literacy is the same. Some students grow up in households where they are surrounded by laptops, phones, reliable internet and online tools that are being used consistently and effectively. But some kids grow up in a house where they don't have those things, or where they don't see these tools put to effective use. Those students are, by definition, digital natives. But are they digitally fluent? Nope. Just because you know how to scroll through TikTok or Instagram, doesn't mean you can navigate onli...

And Another One!!

  Step up to the plate Clay County Florida. A school board member in Clay County thinks that "disciplinary action" should be taken against people who allow books deemed "inappropriate". She goes on to blame librarians for allowing these books into schools. Umm, excuse me ma'am but are you under the impression that the librarian is superhuman. Do you think that they can magically read all of the books in the library and know which ones will offend some random person, at some random time, in the future?  This school board member goes on to explain that she has already identified 75 books containing "pornographic material" that should not be on shelves. They don't provide the list, that would encourage people to think for themselves and that is definitely not the goal. They do however offer some examples, three to be exact. I would have to assume that she choose the most egregious examples to prove her point. The first book is called "Julian is a...